A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours in excess of the development of a wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes captivated countrywide attention adhering to an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family home at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier as well as Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has developed right into a really publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design will work at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and an organization director respectively, seek to develop their loved ones house. The situation has become emblematic of wider disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of founded residents. Based on the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted underneath setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally inhabitants of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning authorization by developing a wall beyond the boundaries of their web page, bringing about an encroachment with a Particular Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result regions are topic to strict controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, especially in a very delicate coastal ecosystem for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their planning authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially built, is in the right placement. Their lawful crew has characterised the action being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their perspective, an allegation that's been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever views of the sea are both equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic efforts through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, an image that has because come to be emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Collect visual evidence of your wall’s place relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times noted, describing how the two Adult males entered the water for the duration of significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm drinking water to photograph the location became one of the most striking descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even further submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant inside the authorized timeline.
At the core in the dispute can be a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain which the wall, as constructed, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of planning paperwork, maps, and problems connected to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by concern for environmental security and adherence to setting up regulation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private view, insisting rather that it's about making sure that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got explained their long-standing relationship to the realm and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just seeking to build a relatives dwelling in accordance With all the law. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Specific Location of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed depending on Experienced suggestions and approved options. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into The ocean during a storm, usually do not change the fundamental facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how organizing disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 about development of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for a situation that lots of observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among non-public land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become more contentious.
The Irish Situations report about René Collier pointed out that the businessman had Beforehand been linked to area advocacy on preparing and environmental challenges, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from incredibly unique Specialist backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have become synonymous While using the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial h2o through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waist-high h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Actual physical fact on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result stays unsure. The courtroom will have to decide whether or not the wall as developed complies with planning authorization and no matter if any encroachment into a Exclusive Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and setting up situations. Yet the human component stays central: neighbours who must Dwell together with one another extended once the lawful fees are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how swiftly a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental issues such as environmental defense and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of all-natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre on the dispute stands partially crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter whether it's going to finally be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will rely upon the court docket’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Among the most closely viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.